Commercial entity. Institutional parent. Listed instrument. Swiss custody.
A four-layer architecture, each layer in its own jurisdiction, under its own counsel, with its own regulatory treatment. This page sets out the explicit separations that industrial buyers, tender desks and institutional screens require.
How the pieces fit together — and how they are deliberately separated.
Governed by Singapore commercial law.
Governed by Luxembourg LP law.
No operational role in GTX supply.
Independent from commercial entity.
A clean line between the commercial operating company and the regulated digital-security instrument of the parent.
Industrial buyers, OEM engineering teams, government tender evaluators and ESG-screening desks all need a clean answer to the same question: what am I actually dealing with?
The answer for GTX is simple: a Singapore Pte. Ltd. commercial operating company, owned 70% by a Luxembourg SCSp institutional parent, drawing supply from a Swiss-vaulted physical reservoir, contracting industrially on its own balance sheet, under its own counsel, in its own jurisdiction. The listed ALKN instrument is a separate matter of the parent, documented at alkemya.com, and does not affect industrial supply terms.
Who governs what.
| Layer 01 · GTX Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) | ACRA (corporate registration) · MAS (financial-services interface) · CNPLaw LLP (corporate counsel) |
|---|---|
| Layer 02 · Alkemya Metacore SCSp (Luxembourg) | Luxembourg LP register · CMS DeBacker (SCSp counsel) · Dentons (regulatory counsel) |
| Layer 03 · ALKN instrument | CNAD EAD-0029 · Bitfinex Securities · HydraX · Archax · Clearstream settlement infrastructure |
| Layer 04 · Swiss custody | Helvetic Securgest SA (Lugano) · FINMA-supervised custody regime · independent audit |
| United States distribution | Foley & Lardner LLP · Regulation S review · not-for-distribution determination |